Burkholderia cepacia: Multifaceted Ally for Sustainable Biotechnologies

Overview of the Microbe#

Burkholderia cepacia belongs to the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc), a group of at least 20 closely related Gram‑negative, catalase‑positive, lactose‑nonfermenting species within the family Burkholderiaceae. Initially described in 1949 by Walter Burkholder as the agent of onion soft rot, it was later identified as an opportunistic human pathogen in cystic fibrosis patients in the 1970s. Bcc genomes are unusually large (7–9 Mb) and multireplicon, conferring high genomic plasticity and metabolic versatility that enable adaptation to diverse niches—soil, water, plant rhizospheres, and clinical settings[1]. B. cepacia can withstand disinfectants such as triclosan and quaternary ammoniums, complicating contamination control in pharmaceutical and healthcare environments. Taxonomically, B. cepacia is one of several “genomovars” within Bcc, differentiated using multilocus sequence typing (MLST), recA phylogeny, and whole‐genome analyses[2]. Its adaptability is underpinned by extensive gene clusters for biodegradation pathways, secondary metabolite biosynthesis, and efflux pumps[3].

Bioremediation of Heavy Metals and Organic Pollutants#

Heavy Metal Resistance and Removal#

B. cepacia strains often harbor metal‑resistance operons enabling survival in soils contaminated with cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), arsenic (As), and chromium (Cr). In vitro assays demonstrate tolerance to AsCl₃ up to 500 mg/L, with growth kinetics showing maximal cell density at 100 mg/L AsCl₃ after ~19 h. Rhizosphere isolates such as B. cepacia CS8 significantly enhance Calendula officinalis growth and phytoextraction of tannery waste pollutants, increasing chlorophyll levels by up to 17 % and antioxidant enzyme activities by 31 % under stress[4].
A recent study by Janaki et al. (2024) isolated a tomato‑rhizosphere strain of B. cepacia capable of solubilizing Cd and Pb at concentrations of 3319 µg/L and 1170.6 µg/L respectively, while producing siderophores, HCN, and IAA, thereby both remediating soils and promoting plant growth.

Degradation of Organic Pollutants#

Beyond metals, B. cepacia degrades chlorinated hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and pesticides via mono‑ and dioxygenase enzymes. Its multireplicon genome encodes numerous aromatic ring cleavage pathways, making it effective for soil and groundwater bioremediation[5]. Biofilm formation enhances pollutant contact and degradation in engineered bioreactors, with field trials demonstrating up to 70 % removal of trichloroethylene in contaminated aquifers.

Production of Bioplastics and Polyhydroxyalkanoates#

Burkholderia cepacia synthesizes polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) as intracellular carbon and energy reserves under nutrient‑limited conditions[6]. PHA yields reach ~54.9 % of cell dry weight (CDW) when cultivated on glycerol or volatile fatty acids, making B. cepacia a viable PHA producer alongside Cupriavidus necator[7]. Characterization of strain JC‑1 revealed monomer compositions with high molecular weights suitable for thermoplastic applications[8].
Process optimization via response surface methodology boosted PHA productivity in B. cepacia BPT1213 when using waste glycerol from biodiesel production, highlighting its compatibility with circular‑economy feedstocks. Advances in bioelectrochemical systems further enhance yields by integrating microbial fuel cell configurations, achieving simultaneous electricity generation and PHA accumulation[9].

Plant Growth Promotion and Phytoremediation#

B. cepacia functions as a plant‑growth‑promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR), exhibiting traits such as phosphate solubilization (up to 337 µg/mL), nitrogen fixation, and IAA synthesis. Inoculation of rice, maize, and cassava roots with PBE (plant‑beneficial Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia) group strains enhances nutrient uptake and stress tolerance under drought and heavy‑metal regimes[10].
Endophytic colonization by B. cepacia stimulates rhizodegradation of organic contaminants via phytostimulation, wherein root exudates enrich microbial degraders, accelerating breakdown of xenobiotics like atrazine and petroleum hydrocarbons[11].

Biocontrol of Phytopathogens#

Several B. cepacia strains produce nonribosomal peptide antibiotics and lipopeptides that inhibit soil‑borne fungi (Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum) and bacterial pathogens via competition and induced systemic resistance[5]. For instance, B. cepacia AMMDR1 seed treatments reduced Pythium damping‑off in peas and sweet corn by >60 % under field conditions[12].
Predatory Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus isolates grown on Bcc as prey show potential as broad‑spectrum biocontrol agents against both Bcc and major phytopathogens, though this remains experimental[13]. Regulatory approval for B. cepacia–based biopesticides has been limited due to opportunistic infection risks, necessitating rigorous strain–specific risk assessment.

Challenges and Future Potential#

While B. cepacia’s versatility is advantageous, its intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics (aminoglycosides, polymyxins) poses public health challenges when used outside contained systems[14]. Contamination of disinfectants and pharmaceutical products by Bcc leads to costly recalls, underscoring the need for stringent quality control protocols.
Industrial scale‑up of PHA production faces hurdles in cost competitiveness, requiring low‑cost feedstocks, high cell‑density cultures, and downstream extraction optimizations[15]. Likewise, field deployment for bioremediation and biocontrol demands robust strain formulation and delivery systems to ensure survival and activity in heterogeneous environments[16].
Future prospects include genome engineering to attenuate pathogenic traits while enhancing degradative and biosynthetic pathways, guided by omics and synthetic‑biology approaches MDPI. Collaborative efforts between researchers, industry, and regulators will be key to unlocking B. cepacia’s full potential in sustainable biotechnologies.

---

Spotlight on Research: Burkholderia cepacia in Metal‑Polluted Soils#

Brief Overview#

Janaki et al. (2024) investigated a tomato rhizosphere isolate of B. cepacia, characterizing its dual role in heavy metal bioremediation and plant growth promotion.

---

Key Insights#

• The isolate tolerated up to 4 mM Cd and Pb, solubilizing 3319 µg/L Cd and 1170.6 µg/L Pb.
• Produced plant growth regulators (IAA, siderophores, HCN) and antifungal activity against R. solani and F. oxysporum.
• Enhanced tomato seed germination, plant height, and biomass under metal stress.

Why This Matters#

This study exemplifies the integration of heavy‑metal remediation and agricultural productivity, demonstrating how a single strain can address environmental and food‑security challenges simultaneously.

Summary Table: Spotlight Study#

Category	Details
Lead Researchers	M. Janaki, P. Kirupanantha‑Rajan, S. Senthil‑Nathan et al.
Affiliations	National Pingtung Univ. of Science & Technology; Kaohsiung District Agricultural Research Station (Taiwan)
Research Focus	Heavy‑metal bioremediation & plant growth promotion
Key Breakthroughs	Solubilized Cd (3319 µg/L) & Pb (1170.6 µg/L); produced IAA, HCN, siderophores; antifungal activity
Collaborative Efforts	Taiwan Univ.–Regional Station collaboration
Published Work	Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 57:103032 (2024)
Perspective	Environmental microbiology
Publication Date	April 2024
Location	Taiwan
Key Findings	Enhanced tomato growth and fungal pathogen inhibition under heavy‑metal stress.

Conclusion#

Burkholderia cepacia is a double‑edged genus—an opportunistic pathogen in healthcare yet a powerhouse for environmental biotechnology. Its metabolic diversity enables heavy‑metal remediation, bioplastic production, plant growth promotion, and biocontrol. Addressing safety concerns, optimizing processes, and refining strain engineering will be pivotal to safely harness B. cepacia for the circular bioeconomy and sustainable agriculture.

References#

1. Depoorter, E., De Canck, E., Peeters, C., Wieme, A. D., Cnockaert, M., Zlosnik, J. E. A., LiPuma, J. J., Coenye, T., & Vandamme, P. (2020). Burkholderia cepacia complex taxon K: Where to split? Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, Article 1594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01594
2. Vandamme, P., & Dawyndt, P. (2011). Classification and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex: Past, present and future. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 34(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2010.10.002
3. Tavares, M., Kozak, M., Balola, A., & Sá‑Correia, I. (2020). Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: A feared contamination risk in water‑based pharmaceutical products. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 33(3), Article e00139-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00139-19
4. Khan, W. U., Yasin, N. A., Ahmad, S. R., Ali, A., Ahmad, A., Akram, W., … Faisal, M. (2023). Burkholderia cepacia CS8 improves phytoremediation potential of Calendula officinalis for tannery solid waste polluted soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 25(11), 1656–1666. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2023.2183717
5. Parke, J. L. (2000). Burkholderia cepacia: Friend or foe? The Plant Health Instructor, 1. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI‑I‑2000‑0926‑01
6. Zhou, W., Bergsma, S., Colpa, D. I., Euverink, G. J. W., & Krooneman, J. (2023). Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) synthesis and degradation by microbes and applications towards a circular economy. Journal of Environmental Management, 341, Article 118033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118033
7. Kusuma, H. S., Sabita, A., Putri, N. A., Azliza, N., Illiyanasafa, N., Darmokoesoemo, H., Amenaghawon, A. N., & Kurniawan, T. A. (2024). Waste to wealth: Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production from food waste for a sustainable packaging paradigm. Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences, 9, Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2024.100225
8. Chin, J. H.‑C., Samian, M. R., & Normi, Y. M. (2022). Characterization of polyhydroxyalkanoate production capacity, composition and weight synthesized by Burkholderia cepacia JC‑1 from various carbon sources. Heliyon, 8(3), Article e09174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09174 
9. Chamizo‑Ampudia, A., Alonso, R. M., Ariza‑Carmona, L., Sanchiz, Á., & San‑Martín, M. I. (2025). A review of bioelectrochemical strategies for enhanced polyhydroxyalkanoate production. Bioengineering, 12 (6), Article 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060616
10. Santos, I. B. dos, de Araújo Pereira, A. P., de Souza, A. J., Cardoso, E. J. B. N., da Silva, F. G., Oliveira, J. T. C., Verdí, M. C. Q., & Sobral, J. K. (2022). Selection and characterization of Burkholderia spp. for their plant‑growth promoting effects and influence on maize seed germination. Frontiers in Soil Science, 2, Article 805094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2021.805094
11. Santos, I. B. dos, de Araújo Pereira, A. P., de Souza, A. J., Cardoso, E. J. B. N., da Silva, F. G., Oliveira, J. T. C., Verdí, M. C. Q., & Sobral, J. K. (2022). Selection and characterization of Burkholderia spp. for their plant‑growth promoting effects and influence on maize seed germination. Frontiers in Soil Science, 2, Article 805094. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2021.805094
12. Heungens, K., & Parke, J. L. (2000). Zoospore homing and infection events: Effects of the biocontrol bacterium Burkholderia cepacia AMMDR1 on two oomycete pathogens of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(12), 5192–5200. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.12.5192‑5200.2000
13. McNeeley, D., Chanyi, R. M., Dooley, J., Moore, J. E., & Koval, S. F. (2017). Biocontrol of Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria and bacterial phytopathogens by Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 63(4), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2016-0612
14. Sousa, S. A., Ramos, C. G., & Leitão, J. H. (2011). Burkholderia cepacia complex: Emerging multihost pathogens equipped with a wide range of virulence factors and determinants. International Journal of Microbiology, Article 607575. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/607575
15. Chouhan, A., & Tiwari, A. (2025). Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biopolymer from crop residue using bacteria as an alternative to plastics: A review. RSC Advances, 15, 11845–11862. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RA08505A
16. Kumar, S. P., Uthra, K. T., Chitra, V., Damodharan, N., & Pazhani, G. P. (2024). Challenges and mitigation strategies associated with Burkholderia cepacia complex contamination in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Archives of Microbiology, 206(4), Article 159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-024-03921-9
17. Sousa, S. A., Feliciano, J. R., Pita, T., Guerreiro, S. I., & Leitão, J. H. (2017). Burkholderia cepacia complex regulation of virulence gene expression: A review. Genes, 8(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010043